linux: fix epoll_pwait() regression with < 2.6.19
Linux before kernel 2.6.19 does not support epoll_pwait(). Due to a logic error in commit2daf944("unix: add flag for blocking SIGPROF during poll"), the fallback path for ENOSYS was not taken. This commit also adds epoll_pwait() emulation using pthread_sigmask(). The block/unblock operations are not atomic but that is fine for our particular use case, to wit, sleep through SIGPROF signals. This is a back-port of commit67bb2b5from the v1.x branch. Original-PR-URL: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/162 Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> PR-URL: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/165 Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d07ddb8c2
commit
b214fe66ef
@ -125,11 +125,14 @@ void uv__platform_invalidate_fd(uv_loop_t* loop, int fd) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void uv__io_poll(uv_loop_t* loop, int timeout) {
|
||||
static int no_epoll_pwait;
|
||||
static int no_epoll_wait;
|
||||
struct uv__epoll_event events[1024];
|
||||
struct uv__epoll_event* pe;
|
||||
struct uv__epoll_event e;
|
||||
ngx_queue_t* q;
|
||||
uv__io_t* w;
|
||||
sigset_t sigset;
|
||||
uint64_t sigmask;
|
||||
uint64_t base;
|
||||
uint64_t diff;
|
||||
@ -139,7 +142,6 @@ void uv__io_poll(uv_loop_t* loop, int timeout) {
|
||||
int fd;
|
||||
int op;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
static int no_epoll_wait;
|
||||
|
||||
if (loop->nfds == 0) {
|
||||
assert(ngx_queue_empty(&loop->watcher_queue));
|
||||
@ -182,31 +184,42 @@ void uv__io_poll(uv_loop_t* loop, int timeout) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sigmask = 0;
|
||||
if (loop->flags & UV_LOOP_BLOCK_SIGPROF)
|
||||
if (loop->flags & UV_LOOP_BLOCK_SIGPROF) {
|
||||
sigemptyset(&sigset);
|
||||
sigaddset(&sigset, SIGPROF);
|
||||
sigmask |= 1 << (SIGPROF - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(timeout >= -1);
|
||||
base = loop->time;
|
||||
count = 48; /* Benchmarks suggest this gives the best throughput. */
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
if (no_epoll_wait || sigmask) {
|
||||
if (sigmask != 0 && no_epoll_pwait != 0)
|
||||
if (pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &sigset, NULL))
|
||||
abort();
|
||||
|
||||
if (sigmask != 0 && no_epoll_pwait == 0) {
|
||||
nfds = uv__epoll_pwait(loop->backend_fd,
|
||||
events,
|
||||
ARRAY_SIZE(events),
|
||||
timeout,
|
||||
sigmask);
|
||||
if (nfds == -1 && errno == ENOSYS)
|
||||
no_epoll_pwait = 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nfds = uv__epoll_wait(loop->backend_fd,
|
||||
events,
|
||||
ARRAY_SIZE(events),
|
||||
timeout);
|
||||
if (nfds == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) {
|
||||
if (nfds == -1 && errno == ENOSYS)
|
||||
no_epoll_wait = 1;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sigmask != 0 && no_epoll_pwait != 0)
|
||||
if (pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &sigset, NULL))
|
||||
abort();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update loop->time unconditionally. It's tempting to skip the update when
|
||||
* timeout == 0 (i.e. non-blocking poll) but there is no guarantee that the
|
||||
* operating system didn't reschedule our process while in the syscall.
|
||||
@ -219,6 +232,12 @@ void uv__io_poll(uv_loop_t* loop, int timeout) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (nfds == -1) {
|
||||
if (errno == ENOSYS) {
|
||||
/* epoll_wait() or epoll_pwait() failed, try the other system call. */
|
||||
assert(no_epoll_wait == 0 || no_epoll_pwait == 0);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (errno != EINTR)
|
||||
abort();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user