win: fix ESRCH implementation (#4301)
Per documentation, this was the wrong way to test for ESRCH. This hopefully fixes it. Fixes: https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/4300
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f7191e5c2
commit
129362f356
@ -1307,7 +1307,6 @@ static int uv__kill(HANDLE process_handle, int signum) {
|
||||
case SIGINT: {
|
||||
/* Unconditionally terminate the process. On Windows, killed processes
|
||||
* normally return 1. */
|
||||
DWORD status;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (TerminateProcess(process_handle, 1))
|
||||
@ -1317,8 +1316,7 @@ static int uv__kill(HANDLE process_handle, int signum) {
|
||||
* TerminateProcess will fail with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. */
|
||||
err = GetLastError();
|
||||
if (err == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED &&
|
||||
GetExitCodeProcess(process_handle, &status) &&
|
||||
status != STILL_ACTIVE) {
|
||||
WaitForSingleObject(process_handle, 0) == WAIT_OBJECT_0) {
|
||||
return UV_ESRCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1327,15 +1325,16 @@ static int uv__kill(HANDLE process_handle, int signum) {
|
||||
|
||||
case 0: {
|
||||
/* Health check: is the process still alive? */
|
||||
DWORD status;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!GetExitCodeProcess(process_handle, &status))
|
||||
return uv_translate_sys_error(GetLastError());
|
||||
|
||||
if (status != STILL_ACTIVE)
|
||||
return UV_ESRCH;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
switch (WaitForSingleObject(process_handle, 0)) {
|
||||
case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
|
||||
return UV_ESRCH;
|
||||
case WAIT_FAILED:
|
||||
return uv_translate_sys_error(GetLastError());
|
||||
case WAIT_TIMEOUT:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return UV_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
@ -1370,7 +1369,7 @@ int uv_kill(int pid, int signum) {
|
||||
if (pid == 0) {
|
||||
process_handle = GetCurrentProcess();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
process_handle = OpenProcess(PROCESS_TERMINATE | PROCESS_QUERY_INFORMATION,
|
||||
process_handle = OpenProcess(PROCESS_TERMINATE | PROCESS_QUERY_INFORMATION | SYNCHRONIZE,
|
||||
FALSE,
|
||||
pid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user